About the Blog

A healthy dose of the best ideas in medical practice management. Any MGMA employee may contribute to the blog - even our CEO!

Subscribe

Your email:
Navicure

Integrated Healthcare Strategies

Half off MGMA membership

Connect With Us

 
  

MGMA In Practice blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

3 Webinars to help medical practices migrate to EHRs (and incentives)

Posted by Caren Baginski on Wed, Jan 20, 2010
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Welcome to the MGMA In Practice blog. Never miss a post: Subscribe to our RSS feed or sign up by e-mail via the box to the right. Thanks for visiting!

Now is the time for many medical practices to finally make the migration to electronic health records

Guest blog by Lucien Roberts, MHA, FACMPE, MGMA member, executive director, Neuropsychological Services of Virginia, Richmond, Va.

After a long wait, "meaningful use" has been defined, and the electronic health record (EHR) certification guidelines are within days of publication. Now is the time for many medical practices to finally make the migration to EHR.

I have a confession, though. I'm not ready for ARRAgeddon.  My practice doesn't have an EHR, and thinking about moving forward with one gives me chills. Sure, there's the $44,000 per physician incentive in stimulus money, and I know the longer I wait the more that number will shrink. But I also know that EHRs can cost a lot more than $44,000 per physician in upfront expenditures, training, implementation, downtime and ongoing maintenance.

My inbox has been deluged with e-mails offering guarantees of stimulus dollars from vendors. Every healthcare organization out there is offering me a Webinar on the "meaningful use" guidelines. Some are free, others are not. Even my 77-year-old mother, who learned about "meaningful use" during a recent visit to her doctor, may offer her own Webinar. At least Mom's will offer a great recipe or two.

While "meaningful use" and EHR certification are critical, they don't keep me up at night. I want to understand "meaningful use," after all, it's the benchmark for capturing stimulus incentives. I also want to understand the certification guidelines but decided months ago the only EHRs we'd evaluate in our practice must be CCHIT-certified. Vendor promises of future CCHIT will not cut it.

Contracting, training and implementation are my primary concerns.

These three areas are where I can save a lot of money for my practice, or make EHR a big, ugly money pit. And these concerns seem to be but footnotes in most of the offerings out there.   

One exception, I hope, is MGMA's three-part Webinar series that starts Jan. 26. I've signed up for it because it's the only Webinar series that addresses what I feel are the key issues of EHR migration. And by doing the series, I get a CD of different tools to help with the migration and a copy of speaker Margret Amatayakul's book, Electronic Health Records: Transforming Your Medical Practice, 2nd edition, that I almost bought at the MGMA 2009 Annual Conference

  • The first Webinar in the series is an overview: What's "meaningful use" and certification, and what are the hoops we must jump through to qualify for stimulus dollars? One highlight: There will be discussion on preparing practices for migration to EHRs.
  • The second Webinar will address EHR evaluation and selection. More importantly, it promises to address two of my three big concerns: contracting and training. I'm thinking this Webinar is where I will more than recoup my investment in the series. The speakers have helped lots of practices select and purchase EHRs, and I want to glean their contracting/negotiation tips. I want to know how best to use my training dollars and how to prepare my staff and doctors so these dollars are not wasted. (I've wasted training dollars before with practice management system conversions and need to be wiser this time around.)
  • The final Webinar holds similar promise in addressing my third concern: implementation. How can I go from paper to electronic records without costing the practice an arm and a leg and me a pretty good marriage? How do I plan for the conversion? How do I avoid the weeks of unproductive downtime we so often hear about?

Will I still attend some of the free "meaningful use" Webinars from other vendors? At least one or two of them, I guess, though I don't think they'll help with what concerns me most. They won't help me prepare for my upcoming ARRAgeddon. For that, I am hopeful – even optimistic – that MGMA's series will be just what I need to cure my ARRAphobia and begin my migration to EHR.

Tags: , , ,

COMMENTS

I worked mostly in military facilities with various clinics: Primary care and specialties. Although, I'm retired now. When we started using AHLTA our EHR, the many fears you speak of had to first be addressed. 
 
1. There is always downtime regardless of the chosen process:Paper or EHR. No process if failsafe. It was just a matter of determining/explaining what was more beneficial and which of two evils exacted lesser pain. For example. Downtime for paper records occur when: records are misfiled, incomplete,or lost. With the EHR,downtime is caused when the system is down. Either way, the record wouldn't be available for the patient visit. The question then becomes, how to deal with record unavailability- which is a problem for either paper or electronic record. 
 
 
 
With regards to implementation: I don't know how large your clinic is but you can expect to loss about 50% of your access or more until implementation is complete and assume some providers will take longer than others to feel comfortable with it. However, we found that by waving implementation (doing it gradually), access losses were reduced to about 30%. As part of the implementation plan, we trained the providers who were known to be fast learners of new technology first. This allowed us to gage how much time it would actually take for the less technical providers to learn the new system and better plan for decreased access.  
 
 
 
Both systems have many pros and cons. I would say in my experience; the greatest cons to paper are total record loss, inability to decipher the provider's writing, too many documents to look over to extract vital patient history.  
 
The greatest cons for EHR are system down (but at least the record is there when the system is back up) and definitely HIPAA violations because it's just too easy for all your employees to access the record.  
 
 
 
I wish you good luck in your implementation.

posted @ Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:47 PM by The Crane


THere are many benefits of using an appropriate EMR in the practice that are totally unrelated to what the federal or other governmental units are doing. In fact, I would say that you should move a practice into the 21st Century without regard to external funding. Information is readily available to our physicians wherever they have secure access. Interfaces provide for rapid retrieval of informaiton from other providers such as lab and radiology. Secure internal messaging among staff has improved response time and reduced waiting time for patients on results reporting and follow-up care. I could go on and on regarding the improvements we have seen in the 4+ years since we implemented our EMR. Careful planning and partnering has resulted in unplanned downtime of less than 1% over the last four years of operation. YOu can achieve these results in practices with less than 10 physicians if you select the right system, implement correctly, and commit to full support just like you would do if the records were still on paper. It can be done, so "git er done".

posted @ Tuesday, May 11, 2010 1:16 PM by Craig Bakken


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics